Multi-Method Research (Modules 30, 34)
Thursday, June 26; Friday, June 27
Jaye Seawright (Northwestern University)
This module sequence looks at how to productively combine qualitative and quantitative methods. For example, one session looks closely at adding case studies to regression, offering research designs for testing assumptions connected with measurement, confounding, and the existence of a hypothesized causal path. Another will investigate case selection, asking how cases should best be selected from a larger population. Participants will also investigate how multi-method research works in the context of random (or as-if random) assignment, exploring how to design case studies in conjunction with experimental or natural-experimental research. Another session will consider what tools from statistics and machine learning can add to causal inferences based on process tracing. We will also consider mixed-method designs aimed at concept formation and measurement.
Book to Purchase: Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Participants may enter the module sequence after it has begun, but their doing so is discouraged.
Multi-Method Research I (M30, June 26)
This module works through multiple ideas about how to combine qualitative and quantitative research techniques within a single project, working through these concepts with an eye to applications that use regression and similar techniques (e.g., logit, probit, multilevel models) as the quantitative side of an overall design. The goal is to explore optimal research design choices, consider potential weaknesses of such designs, and encounter ideas at the cutting edge of methodological thought in the relevant research traditions.
8:45am - 10:15am – Multi-Method Design: General Principles
This session introduces major paradigms of mixed- and multi-method research, including iteration, triangulation, integration, and more. We will discuss the foundational beliefs of each paradigm regarding qualitative and quantitative research and their interrelation, as well as the pragmatic implications of each approach for combining methods.
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1 and 2. (book to obtain)
-
Beach, Derek. “Multi-Method Research in the Social Sciences: A Review of Recent Frameworks and a Way Forward.” Government and Opposition 55, no. 1 (2020): 163–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.53.
-
Seawright, Jason and Kendra Koivu. Manuscript. The Practice of Multi-Method Research. Chapter 1.
Suggested readings:
-
Crasnow, Sharon (2019). Political science methodology: A plea for pluralism. _Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A_ 78:40-47.
-
Harbers, Imke, and Matthew C. Ingram. “Mixed-methods designs.” The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations 2 (2020): 1117-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n61
1:30pm - 3:00pm – Combining Case Studies and Regression
This session discusses what is known about the strengths and weaknesses of regression-type research and process-tracing qualitative case studies for causal inference. It then explores specific research design strategies for combining these methods in ways that minimize these weaknesses while enhancing the strengths of each method.
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 3. (book to obtain)
-
Lieberman, Evan S., “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (2005): 435–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762.
Suggested readings:
-
Keele, Luke, Randolph T. Stevenson, and Felix Elwert. “The Causal Interpretation of Estimated Associations in Regression Models.” Political Science Research and Methods 8, no. 1 (2020): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.31.
-
Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14, no. 3 (2006): 227–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017.
3:30pm - 5:00pm – Case Selection
This session introduces a range of methods that have been suggested for selecting cases from an available population. We will discuss these methods, and then analyze them in terms of their suitability for a range of different goals, with the objective of deriving guidelines for which methods to use for each objective.
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 4. (book to obtain)
-
Seawright, Jason and Kendra Koivu. Manuscript. The Practice of Multi-Method Research. Chapter 2
Suggested readings:
-
Koivu, Kendra L., and Annika Marlen Hinze. “Cases of Convenience? The Divergence of Theory from Practice in Case Selection in Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50, no. 4 (2017): 1023–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001214.
-
Ingram, Matthew C, and Imke Harbers. “Spatial Tools for Case Selection: Using LISA Statistics to Design Mixed-Methods Research.” Political Science Research and Methods 8, no. 4 (2020): 747–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.3.
Multi-Method Research II (M34, June 27)
This module extends the ideas about mixed- and multi-method design to contexts beyond regression, including natural experiments and laboratory/survey/field experiments; description, concept formation, and measurement; and theory-building.
8:45am - 10:15am – Multi-Method Design with Experiments
This session asks how multi-method design can work with research where the quantitative component involves some kind of experimental research. Such projects are an increasingly important part of social science, and the design implications are different in interesting ways from those raised by regression. This session explores designs that engage with those differences, including designs focused around ideas of experimental realism, network and equilibrium effects, and selecting/designing a treatment.
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 6-7. (book to obtain)
-
Seawright, Jason and Kendra Koivu. Manuscript. The Practice of Multi-Method Research. Chapter 5
Suggested readings:
-
Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, and Lucía Tiscornia. “Iteration in Mixed-Methods Research Designs Combining Experiments and Fieldwork.” Sociological Methods & Research, (March 2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221082595.
-
Levy Paluck, Elizabeth. 2010. “The Promising Integration of Qualitative Methods and Field Experiments.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628(1):59‐71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209351510.
1:30pm - 3:00pm – Multi-Method Designs Centering Case Studies
This session asks what multi-method research can add to studies that are basically qualitative case studies. We will consider exploratory designs where statistical approaches help broaden the range of ideas explored; ways that statistical text-as-data methods can provide support in summarizing and providing context for documents analyzed within qualitative research; approaches for using multi-method designs to facilitate movement across levels of analysis within a case study; and the use of experiments embedded within case studies.
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason and Kendra Koivu. Manuscript. The Practice of Multi-Method Research. Chapters 3 and 4.
-
Goertz, Gary. “Multimethod Research.” Security Studies, 25:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2016.1134016
3:30pm - 5:00pm – Multi-method Designs for Concept-formation, Theory-building, and Measurement
This session explores the long-standing, parallel qualitative, quantitative, and statistical/machine learning literatures on description, measurement, concept formation, and theory-building, and asks whether and how these traditions can be mixed in practice to produce better description, measurements, concepts, and theories. Can this earliest stage of research benefit from the same multi-method paradigms that we earlier applied to causal inference?
Required readings:
-
Seawright, Jason and Kendra Koivu. Manuscript. The Practice of Multi-Method Research. Chapter 6.
-
Seawright, Jason, and David Collier. “Rival Strategies of Validation: Tools for Evaluating Measures of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 47, no. 1 (January 2014): 111–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013489098.
Suggested readings:
-
Andreotta, M., Nugroho, R., Hurlstone, M.J. et al. Analyzing social media data: A mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behav Res 51, 1766–1781 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01202-8
-
Introduction to Cluster Analysis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q0kUCvhmAk